top of page

Wells Fargo faces probe over alleged discriminatory refinancing practices

Writer: Payton Legal Group
Payton Legal Group
Mar 20, 2022
2 min read

Senate Democrats demand answers and additional information from the bank's CEO


Senate Banking Committee chairman Sherrod Brown and other lawmakers have urged regulators to investigate Wells Fargo’s alleged discriminatory mortgage practices during the pandemic. A Bloomberg report revealed that, among major lenders in the US, Wells Fargo had the lowest application-approval rate for Black homeowners in 2020. The bank approved only 47% of refi applications from Black applicants compared to 72% of those from White applicants.

In a letter addressed to Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf, US senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden demanded the bank provide data and additional information regarding its mortgage refinancing practices and its “potentially illegal discrimination against Black homeowners.” In particular, Wells Fargo was asked to produce all data and algorithms used to evaluate refinance applications from Jan. 1, 2010, to Dec. 31, 2021. The senators also requested the following information and records by March 28:

  • Any analyses conducted by Wells Fargo regarding the causes of its relatively low approval rates for Black homeowners seeking to refinance their mortgages and the results of these analyses;

  • Any actions or plans developed by Wells Fargo to redress its relatively low approval rates for Black homeowners seeking to refinance their mortgages;

  • All internal communications and all communications with state and federal regulators regarding Wells Fargo’s relatively low approval rates for Black homeowners seeking to refinance their mortgages.

A Wells Fargo spokesperson denied any wrongdoing in response to the letter, saying that the bank’s internal review of its 2020 lending decisions determined the discrepancy was due to other factors such as credit scores. Paul Turner, the Wells Fargo spokesman, told Bloomberg that they “will continue to work closely with our regulators and other stakeholders on our shared goal of decreasing the homeownership gap for Black and other diverse communities.”

The CFPB, on Wednesday, announced making changes to its supervisory operations. The bureau said it will scrutinize discriminatory conduct that violates fair lending laws and closely examine financial institutions’ decision-making in advertising, pricing, and other areas.

“When a person is denied access to a bank account because of their religion or race, this is unambiguously unfair,” CFPB director Rohit Chopra said in a statement. “We will be expanding our anti-discrimination efforts to combat discriminatory practices across the board in consumer finance.”

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • flipboard-mobile-apps-logo-free-png
  • Tumblr Social Icon

© 2026 Payton Law Group

This website provides general informational and educational content only. The information contained on this website is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, legal advice regarding any specific matter or circumstance. Using this website, including submitting an inquiry or communicating through the website, does not create an attorney-client relationship with Attorney Rusty Payton or Payton Legal Group LLC.

​

Information provided on this website concerning legal matters, bankruptcy, debt relief, foreclosure, mortgages, refinancing, credit, credit scores, consumer protection, real estate, estate planning, wills, trusts, or other legal and financial matters is general in nature. You should consult with a qualified attorney regarding your individual circumstances before making legal decisions or taking action based upon information presented on this website.

Attorney Rusty Payton and Payton Legal Group LLC are responsible for the content of this website. Attorney Rusty Payton is licensed to practice law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

​

Past results, testimonials, case descriptions, or other information presented on this website, if any, do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every legal matter is different and depends upon its individual facts and circumstances.

bottom of page