top of page
Payton Legal Group represents Chicago consumers in matters of foreclosure, bankruptcy, consumer rights, mortgage issues, and

PhPh. 773-682-5210     e. info@payton.legal     w. payton.legal

Suing Banks and Loan Servicers to Enforce Borrowers’ Rights

​

In addition to defending homeowners in state

court foreclosure actions, changes in federal

law have imposed strict standards of conduct on banks and mortgage loan servicers.

These laws provide powerful legal tools to hold financial institutions accountable when they fail to meet their legal obligations.

​

Payton Legal has been a national leader in bringing lawsuits on behalf of borrowers who have been wronged by their mortgage lenders and loan servicers. We regularly enforce borrowers’ rights under Regulation X of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA).

​

Many borrowers—including those who are behind on their mortgage payments, involved in a state court foreclosure, or currently in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy—may have valid legal claims against their mortgage loan servicer, even while the foreclosure is pending.

​

Common Violations That May Create Liability

​

The following conduct may trigger liability under Regulations X and Z, entitling borrowers to statutory damages of $1,000 to $4,000, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees, including damages for emotional distress, credit harm, and other financial losses:

​

  • Failure to Timely Process Loss Mitigation Applications
    Loan servicers must evaluate complete loss mitigation applications—including loan modifications, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, and short sale requests—within 30 business days. Servicers are also required to request any additional documents within five business days of receiving an application.

     

  • Dual Tracking Violation:

Once a borrower submits a loss mitigation application, federal law imposes a 120-day prohibition on advancing foreclosure activity. This includes filing a foreclosure action, scheduling or conducting a foreclosure sale or sheriff’s sale, moving for summary judgment, presenting evidence at trial, or taking any action to advance judgment or sale before assessing late fees or other charges.

​

  • Failure to Disclose Ownership of the Note and Mortgage:
    Under TILA, servicers must respond to proper written requests for information regarding the ownership of the note and mortgage within 10 business days.

​​

  • Failure to Provide Loan Information:
    Servicers must provide accurate information regarding loan payments, payment history, and other loan details within 30 business days of a proper request.

​​

  • Improper Application of Mortgage Payments
    Mortgage payments must be credited on the day they are received and applied to principal, interest, and escrow before assessing late fees or other charges.

​

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • flipboard-mobile-apps-logo-free-png
  • Tumblr Social Icon

© 2026 Payton Law Group

This website provides general informational and educational content only. The information contained on this website is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, legal advice regarding any specific matter or circumstance. Using this website, including submitting an inquiry or communicating through the website, does not create an attorney-client relationship with Attorney Rusty Payton or Payton Legal Group LLC.

​

Information provided on this website concerning legal matters, bankruptcy, debt relief, foreclosure, mortgages, refinancing, credit, credit scores, consumer protection, real estate, estate planning, wills, trusts, or other legal and financial matters is general in nature. You should consult with a qualified attorney regarding your individual circumstances before making legal decisions or taking action based upon information presented on this website.

Attorney Rusty Payton and Payton Legal Group LLC are responsible for the content of this website. Attorney Rusty Payton is licensed to practice law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

​

Past results, testimonials, case descriptions, or other information presented on this website, if any, do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every legal matter is different and depends upon its individual facts and circumstances.

bottom of page